The paper was lengthy but moderately easy. There is no need to consider the past trends, since the entire paper was based on the new pattern. But one thing was common. Like previous online CLATs, there were a few centres where the students faced technical issues.
CLAT 2020 had a total of 150 questions to be attempted in 120 minutes. The negative marking scheme was there; however, considering the difficulty level of the paper, which was easy, the marking scheme should not act as much of a deterrent to the students.
Given below is the section-wise breakup of the paper and the ideal attempts for the top 3 NLUs:
Section |
No. of Questions |
Ideal Attempts |
Good Score |
Level of Difficulty |
Reading Comprehension |
30 |
27-28 |
25+ |
Easy-Medium |
GK, including Current Affairs |
36 |
29-30 |
20+ |
Difficult |
Legal Reasoning |
39 |
34-35 |
28+ |
Easy |
Logical Reasoning |
30 |
25-27 |
22+ |
Moderate |
Quantitative Techniques |
15 |
7-8 |
8+ |
Easy-Moderate |
Total |
150 |
112-118 |
103+ |
Moderate |
The section contained a mix of passages in terms of themes. There were book extracts, excerpts from short stories, and passages on topics of current relevance. The passages were based on:
The section was moderately difficult; and needed around 27-30 minutes to attempt and complete in its entirety. There were 6 passages; with 5 questions each. The questions were a mix of fact based, inferential, and vocabulary/grammar based. These were standard reading-comprehension questions. A good attempt would be somewhere around 25-26 questions.
With a total of 39 questions from 8 passages, this section could be regarded as the easiest one this year. Most of the topics were those that the students were already aware of. The following topics constituted this section:
The second-last topic, i.e., Common Intention and Similar Intention, could be regarded as a bit difficult, but the rest of the passages were easy. A score of 28-29, with an ideal attempt of 34-35 questions, could be regarded as a good score. Due to the length of the section, the time needed was somewhere around 35-37 minutes.
This is the section in which time management is always the key. The section was again neither too difficult nor too easy. With a total of 30 questions, the passages were based on the following topics:
A score of 22+, with an ideal attempt of 25-27 questions, could be considered as good—provided, you were able to allocate 30 minutes to this section.
There were 3 sets and a total of 15 questions. The first set was comparatively easy for students who are comfortable with maths. The remaining two sets were a bit difficult. Any student who would have avoided skipping this section entirely; and attempted at least the first set would have easily scored 5 marks. The rest of the two sets would depend on the time that you allocated to this section. Overall, the section was moderately difficult; and a score of 8 could be considered a good score.
Disclaimer: All information on cut-offs, analysis, answer key, and scores is based on independent analysis and evaluation made by Career Launcher (CL-LST). We do not take responsibility for any decision that might be taken based on this information.
Best wishes.
Team CL-LST